Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wild idea: 9.0? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wild idea: 9.0?
Date
Msg-id 20070424053243.A34AADCC876@svr2.hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wild idea: 9.0?  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wild idea: 9.0?
List pgsql-hackers
> > That would be just because you don't know the numbering scheme.  8.2 to
> > 8.3 is considered "major" in these parts.  See
> > http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning
>
> Is that official policy? I don't see any mention of it in the docs.

Are you somehow suggesting that our website isn't official? Where did you get that idea?

As for inclusion in the docs I beleive we're still waiting for your patch...

/Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO idea - implicit constraints across child tables with a common column as primary key (but obviously not a shared index)
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: RETURN QUERY in PL/PgSQL?