Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
Date
Msg-id 200704232115.38853.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?  ("Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Monday 23 April 2007 18:17, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> That would be just because you don't know the numbering scheme.  8.2 to
> 8.3 is considered "major" in these parts.  See
> http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning

Is that official policy? I don't see any mention of it in the docs.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: cost per transaction
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: cost per transaction