Re: db stats vs table stats - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ed L.
Subject Re: db stats vs table stats
Date
Msg-id 200702231506.34413.pgsql@bluepolka.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to db stats vs table stats  ("Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>)
Responses Re: db stats vs table stats  ("Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>)
List pgsql-general
Oops, typo:  I reversed the inequality.  I've corrected it below.

On Friday February 23 2007 2:02 pm, Ed L. wrote:
> I've been periodically collecting the stats stored in
> pg_statio_all_tables and pg_stat_database for ~30 different
> clusters, and have noticed a curiosity.
>
> I would have thought that for a given period, the change in
> pg_stat_database.blks_read would be >= the sum of the changes
> in pg_statio_user_tables.heap_blks_read +
> pg_statio_user_tables.idx_blks_read +
> pg_statio_user_tables.toast_blks_read +
> pg_statio_user_tables.tidx_blks_read.
>
> In short, the total would be >= heap + idx + toast + idx for
> user tables.
>
> It does not appear that way.  The table-level IO stats appear
> to be typically 1-2 orders of magnitude larger than the
> db-level stats.  Can anyone explain that?
>
> TIA.
> Ed

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: complex referential integrity constraints
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: urgent: upgraded to 8.2, getting kernel panics