Re: pg_proc without oid? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_proc without oid?
Date
Msg-id 200702191930.22001.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_proc without oid?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> SQL script maybe, much along the lines Greg was just mentioning.

I would welcome that, although a similar suggestion was rejected a few 
years ago, which is why I didn't pursue it here.

> you can't just decide to leave out a few OIDs on the
> spur of the moment.

I still don't understand why that would be a problem, aside from the 
fmgrtab problem that is specific to pg_proc.  Other system catalogs 
also have mixed entries with and without explicit OIDs.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Guillaume Smet"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes