Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes
Date
Msg-id 200702191934.56521.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> > Somehow this seems like implementing RAID within postgres,
>
> RAID and LVM too.  I can't get excited about re-inventing those
> wheels when perfectly good implementations already exist for us to
> sit on top of.

I expect that someone will point out that Windows doesn't support RAID 
or LVM, and we'll have to reimplement it anyway.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_proc without oid?
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Short varlena headers and arrays