Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> This starts to look awfully similar to MultiXactIds. And probably using
> such a mechanism would allow you to "rollback" any number of row locks:
> take the current membersoof the "multicid", substract the one that
> rolled back and use that as new multicid. The main difference is that
> you'd need to store both the locker Cid and the mode (shared/exclusive).
Humm, sorry, obviously this makes no sense at all because I mentally
mixed the Xid locker and the Cids.
> The other difference is that multicids can be stored locally to a
> backend, no need to have SLRUs etc.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
