Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> >>I think the patch is ready. Please remove the PHANTOMCID_DEBUG define
> >>and ifdef blocks before applying.
> >
> >BTW, I don't care much for the terminology "phantom cid" ... there's
> >nothing particularly "phantom" about them, seeing they get onto disk.
> >Can anyone think of a better name? The best I can do offhand is
> >"merged cid" or "cid pair", which aren't inspiring.
>
> MultiCid, like the MultiXacts? Maybe not, they're quite different beasts...
Dual cid? Double cid?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
