Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> I think the patch is ready. Please remove the PHANTOMCID_DEBUG define
>> and ifdef blocks before applying.
>
> BTW, I don't care much for the terminology "phantom cid" ... there's
> nothing particularly "phantom" about them, seeing they get onto disk.
> Can anyone think of a better name? The best I can do offhand is
> "merged cid" or "cid pair", which aren't inspiring.
MultiCid, like the MultiXacts? Maybe not, they're quite different beasts...
Alias cid? Mapped cid? Compressed cid? Hero cid? :)
I'm happy with phantom cid myself. It sounds cool, and they are a bit
phantom-like because the true meaning of a phantom cid is lost when the
transaction ends.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
