How does EXEC_BACKEND process signals? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Subject | How does EXEC_BACKEND process signals? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20070126233221.GY13036@alvh.no-ip.org Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: How does EXEC_BACKEND process signals?
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
In testing the new autovac facility, I noticed this log in the EXEC_BACKEND (on Linux) scenario (I pressed Ctrl-C only once): DEBUG: postmaster received signal 2 LOG: received fast shutdown request LOG: aborting any active transactions FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command DEBUG: drop cascades to table fktable DEBUG: drop auto-cascades to type fktable DEBUG: drop cascades to table pktable DEBUG: drop auto-cascades to type pktable DEBUG: drop auto-cascades to constraint pktable_pkey on table pktable DEBUG: drop auto-cascades to index pktable_pkey DEBUG: server process (PID 21893) exited with exit code 1 DEBUG: server process (PID 21895) exited with exit code 1 DEBUG: server process (PID 21899) exited with exit code 1 DEBUG: server process (PID 21900) exited with exit code 1 DEBUG: server process (PID 21902) exited with exit code 1 DEBUG: server process (PID 21904) exited with exit code 1 DEBUG: server process (PID 21906) exited with exit code 1 LOG: shutting down LOG: autovacuum launcher shutting down DEBUG: forked new backend, pid=21907 socket=6 LOG: database system is shut down LOG: background writer process (PID 21220) exited with exit code 0 LOG: terminating any other active server processes DEBUG: sending SIGQUIT to process 21907 DEBUG: server process (PID 21907) exited with exit code 1 LOG: all server processes terminated; reinitializing LOG: database system was shut down at 2007-01-26 20:21:10 CLST LOG: checkpoint record is at 0/4293338 LOG: redo record is at 0/4293338; undo record is at 0/0; shutdown TRUE LOG: next transaction ID: 0/17395; next OID: 60723 LOG: next MultiXactId: 1; next MultiXactOffset: 0 LOG: database system is ready DEBUG: transaction ID wrap limit is 2147484176, limited by database "postgres" LOG: shutting down DEBUG: recycled transaction log file "000000010000000000000002" DEBUG: recycled transaction log file "000000010000000000000003" LOG: database system is shut down The strange thing is that we're seeing a "forked a new backend" line _after_ the shutdown signal was received. I don't think this is related to my local changes, because I've been careful with that, but one never knows. I wonder if this could cause more than just a curiosity. The backend was evidently shut down promptly. I'll post the autovac patch right away. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
pgsql-hackers by date: