Re: BUG #2885: to_char function - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: BUG #2885: to_char function
Date
Msg-id 200701122006.l0CK6PC01565@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #2885: to_char function  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #2885: to_char function  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
I updated our documentation for CC:

        <entry>century component of year (minimum 2 digits)</entry>


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Akio Iwaasa" <iwaasa@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp> writes:
> > When I've used "to_char" function to convert "Date" to
> > "century" format text, '2000-01-01' was converted in
> > the 21st century.
>
> >  postgres=# select to_char('2000-01-01'::date, 'CC') ;
> >   to_char
> >  ---------
> >   21
> >  (1 row)
>
> I'm not entirely sure that this is wrong, because of the behavior of
> the Y and YY fields.
>
> regression=# select to_char('2007-01-01'::date, 'CC YY') ;
>  to_char
> ---------
>  21 07
> (1 row)
>
> regression=# select to_date('21 07', 'CC YY');
>   to_date
> ------------
>  2007-01-01
> (1 row)
>
> regression=# select to_char('2000-01-01'::date, 'CC YY') ;
>  to_char
> ---------
>  21 00
> (1 row)
>
> regression=# select to_date('21 00', 'CC YY');
>   to_date
> ------------
>  2000-01-01
> (1 row)
>
> If we make CC treat 2000 as being in the 20th century, what should YY
> do?
>
> Perhaps more to the point, how do these things act in Oracle?
> to_char is basically an Oracle-compatibility function so we should
> adopt their bugs :-(
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
>                 http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #2885: to_char function
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #2885: to_char function