Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix
Date
Msg-id 20070107112232.GA19187@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:42:06AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 23:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Everyone using these tools knows about the two-pass behavior.
> >
> > No, not everyone knows. In fact I would argue that most do not know. It
> > isn't intuitive to the process. You *expect* that an index will be made.
>
> The idea for the warning message actually came from Peter.

FWIW, I have this problem with LaTeX also, which needs multiple passes
occasionally to fix cross-references and idexes and stuff. The solution
I have in the makefile is a fragment like the following:

while egrep -q "^LaTeX Warning:.*Rerun to" logfile ; do
  rm logfile
  latex taxfile
done

I don't know enough about the relevent tool to know if they actually
generate a warning about whether they need to be rerun. In any case it
seems a much better approach to simply run it again when needed rather
than printing a warning.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: ECPG regression test failures on Solaris 10/x86_64 with Sun studio 11
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances