Re: effective_cache_size vs units - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Date
Msg-id 200612182208.32184.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to effective_cache_size vs units  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: effective_cache_size vs units  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: effective_cache_size vs units  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Is there any special reason why I can't use "Mb" and "Gb" and such
> for effective_cache_size, the way I can for say shared_buffers?

You can't use "Mb" or "Gb" for shared_buffers either, because those are 
not accepted units.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Typo in pg_dump documentation and new suggestion for Release Notes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE