Re: effective_cache_size vs units - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Date
Msg-id 458707A0.4080701@hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: effective_cache_size vs units  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: effective_cache_size vs units  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Is there any special reason why I can't use "Mb" and "Gb" and such
>> for effective_cache_size, the way I can for say shared_buffers?
> 
> You can't use "Mb" or "Gb" for shared_buffers either, because those are 
> not accepted units.
> 

Oh, you mean MB vs Mb. Man, it had to be that simple :)

Sorry about the noise.

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore fails with a custom backup file