Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

effective_cache_size vs units - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject effective_cache_size vs units
Date
Msg-id 4586FDF7.5050106@hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: effective_cache_size vs units  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Is there any special reason why I can't use "Mb" and "Gb" and such for
effective_cache_size, the way I can for say shared_buffers?

//Magnus

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mike G"
Date:
Subject: Typo in pg_dump documentation and new suggestion for Release Notes
Next
From: "Matt Miller"
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE