Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2006 16:50 schrieb Michael Dean:
> Ad hoc decisions by an appointed committee that is reactive to
> indiosyncratic proposals seems somewhat unethical. Perhaps I am wrong,
> but wouldn't it be better if there were a document clearly specifying
> spending priorities that was relatively accepted by consensus of a broad
> group of pg'ers, and that an opportunity to qualify for these monies
> could be promulgated to the broader group?
That is the point of this discussion.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
