Home > mailing lists

Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From	Peter Eisentraut
Subject	Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i
Date	September 24, 2006 08:20:34
Msg-id	200609241020.23452.peter_e@gmx.net Whole thread Raw
In response to	Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses	Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i (Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>) Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List	pgsql-hackers

Tree view

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On the other hand, I don't understand why DocBook would be Latin-1
> only. What would be the point of that limitation?  Some googling
> seems to reveal that people indeed uses other charsets, UTF-8 in
> particular (but also Big5, Latin-2, etc), so apparently this isn't
> set in stone.  (I admit that they mainly talk about XML Docbook
> though).

DocBook SGML is Latin 1; DocBook XML, like all XML, is UCS-4.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: Stephen Frost
Date: 24 September 2006, 06:14:02
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 w/ VALUES

From: "Dave Page"
Date: 24 September 2006, 10:52:02
Subject: Re: Buildfarm alarms

Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Previous

Next