Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Oh sorry, it wasn't clear from the commit entry. It's not that
> DocBook doesn't support the character or that it can't be
> represented. It's just not supported in the document encoding we're
> using.
No, no, and no.
The reason that it doesn't work is that the document character set for
DocBook is Latin 1, so any attempt to refer to a character not in this
set is going to fail.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/