Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because
Date
Msg-id 20060923121906.GB24323@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:54:47AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > Well you could always use te HTML4 ı which most tools should
> > understand. At least browsers have good support for this kind of
> > entity.
>
> Please review the recent thread on pgsql-docs before reiterating all the
> suggestions.

Oh sorry, it wasn't clear from the commit entry. It's not that DocBook
doesn't support the character or that it can't be represented. It's
just not supported in the document encoding we're using.

Sorry for the noise.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i