Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release

From: Bruce Momjian
Subject: Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release
Date: ,
Msg-id: 200608301922.k7UJMub06637@momjian.us
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  ("Joshua D. Drake")
Responses: Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  ("Joshua D. Drake")
List: pgsql-advocacy

Tree view

First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Josh Berkus, )
 Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Oleg Bartunov, )
 Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Lukas Kahwe Smith, )
  Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Shane Ambler, )
 Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
  Re: Quote Sources: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Josh Berkus, )
 Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Mike Ellsworth, )
 Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  ("Magnus Hagander", )
 Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Chris Browne, )
  Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Bruce Momjian, )
   Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
    Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Bruce Momjian, )
     Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
      Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (David Fetter, )
       Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
      Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Shane Ambler, )
       Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (David Fetter, )
        Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
       Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Peter Eisentraut, )
        Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Shane Ambler, )
         Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
       Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Chris Browne, )
        Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Ron Mayer, )
         Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  ("Jonah H. Harris", )
          Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Josh Berkus, )
           Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
            Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Ron Mayer, )
             Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  ("Harald Armin Massa", )
   Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release  (Josh Berkus, )

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > Also, you mentioned Full Disjunctions, which doesn't look like it will
> > be in 8.2, and because it is so unusual, you would have to explain why
> > it is so great, and given the lack of community people saying it is
> > great, I am unsure if it even should be mentioned if it is on pgfoundry.
>
> This one I do not agree with. We don't have to explain it beyond a
> single sentence, people can do their own research on if they need it.
> This is PR :). Full Disjunctions falls directly into the Most Advanced
> Open Source Database arena (and considering Ingres is open source we
> have to fight for this).
>
> Frankly there are several projects on pgFoundry that need some advocacy
> on this release including:
>
> Full Disjunctions
> .Npgsql (if it hits 1.0)
> Orafce
>
> Possibly some reiteration around:
>
> pljava
> pgpool

Agreed, but we better mention it is on pgfoundry rather than in the main
code.

> These are all items that greatly enhance the usability and functionality
> argument.
>
>
> >
> > Also, we don't have some items in CVS like bitmapped indexes, so those
> > might need to be removed as the feature list solidifies.
> >
>
> I thought bitmapped indexes had been reviewed? eek...

We don't even have a final patch for it.  Because we are dealing with
other patches we aren't pushing on the submitter at this time.

--
  Bruce Momjian   
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-advocacy by date:

From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: First Draft of 8.2 Release
From: "Liam O'Duibhir"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL rebranding