Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?
Date
Msg-id 200608252013.40132.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?
Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Um, but initdb doesn't use libpq, so it's going to need its own copy
> anyway.

initdb certainly links against libpq.

> I agree with Martijn that putting these into libpq's API 
> seems like useless clutter.

Where else to put it?  We need it in libpq anyway if we want this 
behavior in all client applications (by default).

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Martin Atukunda"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?