Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?
Date
Msg-id 2051.1156522252@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Am Freitag, 25. August 2006 17:30 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout:
>> Umm, why export all these functions. For starters, does this even need
>> to be in libpq?

> Where else would you put it?
> ...
> initdb has different requirements.  Let me know if you have a different way to 
> refactor it that satisfies initdb.

Um, but initdb doesn't use libpq, so it's going to need its own copy
anyway.  I agree with Martijn that putting these into libpq's API
seems like useless clutter.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: [Open Item] Re: Autovacuum on by default?