On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:01:03AM -0300, Jorge Godoy wrote:
> I can think that spreading processing requirements should be one. And
> distributing load another one. Disk space can be solved with new disks and
> tablespaces, but we can't yet distribute the load through several servers
> without partitioning.
The cost of inter-node communication isn't nothing, though. It
strikes me as at least possible that the overhead of dblink is going
to be larger than whatever gains one makes from adding a new server.
For only 20M rows, I find it pretty hard to believe the gain is going
to be demonstrable.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Everything that happens in the world happens at some place. --Jane Jacobs
