Dave Cramer wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> Doesn't it make more sense to use the statement name ?
>
> If I prepare S_3 as "select * from foo"
>
> then the bind log is going to show me "select * from foo" not S_3
>
> I think in the case of named statements I'd prefer "S_3" however as I
> think about this in the case of unnamed statements I'd prefer the
> "select * from foo"
The bind shows:
(errmsg("statement: <protocol> <BIND> %s [PREPARE: %s]",
The first %s is the statement name, and the second %s is the query.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
