Re: pgxs problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pgxs problem
Date
Msg-id 200607200042.26410.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgxs problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Yes, that's pretty small-minded.  It should be something like
> > PG_CONFIG = pg_config
> > bindir := $(shell $(PG_CONFIG) --bindir)
> > That way you can override it.
>
> No objection here, although I'm not entirely convinced why anyone
> would prefer doing that to setting their PATH.  If the pg_config you
> want isn't (first in) your PATH, none of the other PG programs will
> be either, which seems like an awkward situation for getting any
> PG-related work done.

Well, with the above change, both camps would be happy.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: plPHP and plRuby
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: How does the planner deal with multiple possible indexes?