Re: pgxs problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgxs problem
Date
Msg-id 16418.1153347354@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgxs problem  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: pgxs problem  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Yes, that's pretty small-minded.  It should be something like
> PG_CONFIG = pg_config
> bindir := $(shell $(PG_CONFIG) --bindir)
> That way you can override it.

No objection here, although I'm not entirely convinced why anyone would
prefer doing that to setting their PATH.  If the pg_config you want
isn't (first in) your PATH, none of the other PG programs will be
either, which seems like an awkward situation for getting any PG-related
work done.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Max size of a btree index entry
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Max size of a btree index entry