Re: [HACKERS] putting CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in qsort_comparetup() - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] putting CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in qsort_comparetup()
Date
Msg-id 200607142112.58655.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: putting CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in qsort_comparetup()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] putting CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in qsort_comparetup()
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> We might have to just tolerate this, but if it occurs on a lot of
> platforms I'd have second thoughts about applying the patch.  Anyone
> familiar with the internals of glibc's qsort, in particular?

Doesn't look like it's allocating any nonlocal memory:

http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/stdlib/qsort.c?rev=1.12&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=glibc

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: putting CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in qsort_comparetup()
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Maintenance and External Projects (try 2)