On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thursday 13 July 2006 15:39, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>>> Aside from obviously the big issue of who maintains all the pgfoundry
>>>>> stuff, I also think that the PostgreSQL family would benefit from a
>>>>> distribution that is more "and the kitchen sink" style. I do not know
>>>>> exactly if Bizgres could be considered just that? Or maybe it could get
>>>>> promoted to be that?
>>>>
>>>> Lukas, that is what www.mammothpostgresql.org is :)
>>>
>>> Then *it* needs to be promoted more, since this is actually the first
>>> I'd heard of it :(
>>
>> Were trying man :) I have people building for most major distributions
>> at this point. We should have FreeBSD soon, as well as MacOSX.
>>
>
> I believe it was Lukas who mentioned elsewhere, this is not a vendor nuetral
> project. I actually am already working on a adding a list of os/package
> options to the download page based on other feedback, are people comfortable
> allowing mammothpostgresql to go on that list? (I wouldn't be mainly because
> I don't see a clear distinction between it and things like mammoth
> replicator)
I have no problems with it ... there is no license or cost to use, and,
I'm guessing from what Joshua has said, the source code come with it ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
