Patch applied. Change made so test is WIN32, and add comment about
different structure ordering on Win32 for IPv6 use.
Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi. Tom-san.
>
> Oops, I understood it. Thank you for suggestion.
> What condition is this?
>
> Regards,
> Hiroshi Saito
>
> From: "Tom Lane"
>
> > "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp> writes:
> >>> Why do we need to reorder the fields in the struct?
> >
> >> Eh? Even my FreeBSD used well shows a structure object.
> >
> > The standard lists the fields in the other order:
> > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/netdb.h.html
> >
> > Even though the standard doesn't say that that has to be the physical
> > order, every other platform besides Windows does it that way. The patch
> > as given is unacceptable because it *will* break other platforms (mine
> > for instance ;-)). If it has to be this way for Windows then we need
> > some sort of platform-specific #ifdef. Considering that the code works
> > as-is on several sorts of Windows builds, we probably need something
> > even more specific than that, like #if MSVC-before-version-XX.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
