Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > I note that the rowcount is not altered by the one-time filter. Is this
> > an issue? I imagine the problem is not being able to estimate the
> > number of rows that pass the filter.
>
> That's intentional. The filter is either going to pass all or none of
> the rows, not some fraction of them. It clearly isn't very reasonable
> to guess that it will pass none of them (except if the qual is actually
> constant FALSE).
>
> > I also wonder whether it wouldn't be better in this case to apply each
> > filter to each arm of the merge join.
>
> Uh, why? For the most part, I'd think the higher you can put the filter
> in the plan tree, the better.
Huh, sorry, I had misunderstood the meaning of a _one_-time filter :-)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
