Re: Ranges for well-ordered types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: Ranges for well-ordered types
Date
Msg-id 20060611182456.GC20757@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Ranges for well-ordered types  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 11:22:41AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> You're probably going to have to give up on B-Tree indexes for PERIODs, and
> look towards GiST.  For one thing, I would see UNIQUE in the context of a
> PERIOD defined as non-overlapping.  e.g.:

If GiST could define UNIQUE indexes, this probably would've been done
already. Fix that, and the index itself will appear shortly
afterwards...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Ranges for well-ordered types
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(),