Re: Why do we want to %Remove behavior of postmaster -o - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Why do we want to %Remove behavior of postmaster -o
Date
Msg-id 200606060953.30206.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why do we want to %Remove behavior of postmaster -o  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Why do we want to %Remove behavior of postmaster -o  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 04:27 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Actually, the TODO item is very badly worded.  The idea is to get rid of
> the spelling differences between postmaster and postgres options, and
> then there will be no need for '-o' because you'll just say what you
> want --- that is, "-o -foo" and "-foo" will be interchangeable.

This is already done.

I suppose that the idea was that the -o option should be phased out over a 
couple of releases.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: fillfactor using WITH syntax
Next
From: Travis Cross
Date:
Subject: Duplicate rows sneaking in despite PRIMARY KEY / UNIQUE constraint