Re: Why do we want to %Remove behavior of postmaster -o - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Why do we want to %Remove behavior of postmaster -o
Date
Msg-id 15691.1149601541@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why do we want to %Remove behavior of postmaster -o  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 04:27 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> Actually, the TODO item is very badly worded.  The idea is to get rid of
>> the spelling differences between postmaster and postgres options, and
>> then there will be no need for '-o' because you'll just say what you
>> want --- that is, "-o -foo" and "-foo" will be interchangeable.

> This is already done.

Oh, right.  The patch you still have uncommitted had to do with getting
rid of the separate postmaster and postgres executables, right?  Is that
going anywhere, or did you decide it's not worth the trouble?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: How to avoid transaction ID wrap
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] psql -A (unaligned format) eats too much