Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From mark@mark.mielke.cc
Subject Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Date
Msg-id 20060425183817.GA9241@mark.mielke.cc
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Responses Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 01:33:38PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Sad, cause the AMD is, on a price / performance scale, twice the
> processor for the same money as the Intel.

Maybe a year or two ago. Prices are all coming down. Intel more
than AMD.

AMD still seems better - but not X2, and it depends on the workload.

X2 sounds like biggotry against Intel... :-)

Cheers,
mark

--
mark@mielke.cc / markm@ncf.ca / markm@nortel.com     __________________________
.  .  _  ._  . .   .__    .  . ._. .__ .   . . .__  | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/    |_     |\/|  |  |_  |   |/  |_   |
|  | | | | \ | \   |__ .  |  | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__  | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

  One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
                       and in the darkness bind them...

                           http://mark.mielke.cc/


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs