Re: pg_class catalog question... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pg_class catalog question...
Date
Msg-id 20060331154118.GB12579@surnet.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_class catalog question...  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_class catalog question...
List pgsql-hackers
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 3/31/06, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu> wrote:
> > What if you put your char[64] before relhassubclass, then you
> > don't change CLASS_TUPLE_SIZE.
> 
> Thought about that... but it would be an ugly place for this column. 
> I know I could get around it by renumbering the attribute, but that's
> just a kludge.

What are you using a char[64] for anyway?  You should probably consider
using NameData, if you want to store an identifier.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_class catalog question...
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_class catalog question...