Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem
Date
Msg-id 20060325131018.GF80726@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:24:00PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> memory. Using too much memory could also impact overall elapsed time
> when we have concurrent users, so the question is should we optimise
> resources for the multi-user case or for the single user case? Where is
> the right balance point?

Sounds like what we need is a GUC... I know I certainly have cases where
I'll take faster and using more memory over the alternative.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Domains as Subtypes
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync