On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:00:14PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On 3/21/06, Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote:
> > ISTM that having a currency type is pretty common for most databases; I
> > don't really see any reason not to just include it. Likewise for a type
> > that actually stores timezone info with a timestamp.
>
> This really should be generalized to work with all the base types
> because there are strong use cases for each. (timezones with
> timestamps, currencies with numeric, physical units with floats and
> ints)
Have you looked at the code? It *is* generalised. All you need to do is
provide a table of tags and indicate the base-type. Hence:
currency type = table of currencies + numeric base type
timestamp+zone type = table of timezones + timestamp base type
physical unit = table of units + numeric base type
These are examples already included in the code, but I'm sure people
can come up with more.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
