Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?
Date
Msg-id 200603030022.38873.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?  ("Craig A. James" <cjames@modgraph-usa.com>)
Responses Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?  ("Craig A. James" <cjames@modgraph-usa.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Craig A. James wrote:
> Unfortunately, we're also using a second library (OpenBabel) that is
> written in C++.  A good portion of the code I've written is a wrapper
> layer that hides the C++ objects and presents a simple C wrapper that
> works for Postgres.

I suggest if you want to get any concrete advice out of this, post us 
the commands that you execute and the error messages that you get.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "John"
Date:
Subject: Installation problem
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Summit, Call for Contributions