Re: majordomo unmaintained, postmaster emails ignored? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Roman Neuhauser
Subject Re: majordomo unmaintained, postmaster emails ignored?
Date
Msg-id 20060228120431.GA80007@isis.sigpipe.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: majordomo unmaintained, postmaster emails ignored?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: majordomo unmaintained, postmaster emails ignored?
List pgsql-general
# scrappy@postgresql.org / 2006-02-27 16:32:55 -0400:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
>
> ># scrappy@postgresql.org / 2006-02-26 19:01:58 -0400:
> >>'k, I just checked all the lists you listed, and you are subscribed to
> >>each of them ... are you not receiving messages?

(...)

> Can you try something more recent then "last year"?

Here's a copy of an email I sent you off list documenting
stalled-for-approval requests from yesterday.

: Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:43:54 +0100
: From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz>
: To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
: Subject: Re: [GENERAL] majordomo unmaintained, postmaster emails ignored?
: Message-ID: <20060227144354.GK65308@isis.sigpipe.cz>
: References: <20060226182908.GB39348@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20060226143419.D1005@ganymede.hub.org>
: Mime-Version: 1.0
: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
: Content-Disposition: inline
: In-Reply-To: <20060226143419.D1005@ganymede.hub.org>
: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
: Status: RO
:
:     Note: I've removed pgsql-general@ from the recipient list so as to
:     reduce clutter. Feel free to add it again for you reply if you feel
:     this is relevant on that list.
:
: # scrappy@postgresql.org / 2006-02-26 14:36:47 -0400:
: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
: > >I've been waiting five months for the majordomo moderators to approve
: > >my subscription requests to several @postgresql.org mailing lists.
: >
: > the majordomo moderators don't have to approve subscribe requests
:
:     The above is false under *certain circumstances*. Marc, can you
:     tell me what attribute(s) of these requests cause(s) majordomo to
:     wait for approval?
:
:     I've just had this exchange with majordomo@postgresql.org (only the hackers
:     request is put here for brevity):
:
:     : Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:28:18 +0100
:     : From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz>
:     : To: majordomo@postgresql.org
:     :
:     : subscribe-set pgsql-docs noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-docs#postgresql.org@sigpipe.cz
:     : subscribe-set pgsql-hackers noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql.org@sigpipe.cz
:     : subscribe-set pgsql-performance noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-perf#postgresql.org@sigpipe.cz
:     : subscribe-set pgsql-sql noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-sql#postgresql.org@sigpipe.cz
:
:     : Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:28:18 -0400
:     : From: majordomo-owner@postgresql.org
:     : To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz>
:     : Subject: Majordomo results
:     :
:     :
:     : >>>> subscribe-set pgsql-hackers noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql.org@sigpipe.cz
:     : ---- The subscribe command did not succeed.
:     : ----
:     : ---- The request
:     : ----   "subscribe-set pgsql-hackers noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql.org@sigpipe.cz"
:     : ---- must be confirmed by
:     : ----   neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql.org@sigpipe.cz
:     : ---- and approved by the moderators.  Confirmation instructions have been
:     : ---- mailed in a separate message.
:     : ----
:
:     : Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:28:17 -0400
:     : From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
:     : To: neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql.org@sigpipe.cz
:     : Subject: BC9A-BD57-4C44 : CONFIRM from pgsql-hackers (subscribe)
:     :
:     : __
:     : The following request
:     :
:     :   "subscribe-set pgsql-hackers noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql.org@sigpipe.cz"
:     :
:     : was sent to
:     : by Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz>.
:     :
:     : To accept or reject this request, please do one of the following:
:     (...)
:
:     : Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:29:11 +0100
:     : From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql.org@sigpipe.cz>
:     : To: majordomo@postgresql.org
:     : Subject: Re: BC9A-BD57-4C44 : CONFIRM from pgsql-hackers (subscribe)
:     :
:     : accept BC9A-BD57-4C44
:
:     : Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:29:13 -0400
:     : From: majordomo-owner@postgresql.org
:     : To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql.org@sigpipe.cz>
:     : Subject: Majordomo results: Re: BC9A-BD57-4C44 : CONFIRM from pgsql-
:     :
:     :
:     : >>>> accept BC9A-BD57-4C44
:     : ---- The accept command for token BC9A-BD57-4C44 succeeded,
:     : ---- but further approval is needed.
:     : ----
:     : ---- Now the request must be approved by the moderators.
:     : ---- The results will be mailed to you after this is done.
:     : ----
:     : ----
:     :
:     : Valid commands processed: 1
:     : 0 succeeded, 1 stalled, and 0 failed.
:     :
:     :
:     : Use the following command:
:     :   sessioninfo 530ce04b8a9f02fee27a58acb99d9cb88a092ae2
:     : to see technical information about this session.

--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man.  You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE.             http://bash.org/?255991

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "pgsql-general@list.coretech.ro"
Date:
Subject: Re: Temporal Databases, offtopic - relative updates
Next
From: Douglas McNaught
Date:
Subject: Re: Size comparison between a Composite type and an