Re: Size comparison between a Composite type and an - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Douglas McNaught
Subject Re: Size comparison between a Composite type and an
Date
Msg-id 87veuzoeg3.fsf@suzuka.mcnaught.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Size comparison between a Composite type and an equivalent Text field  (denis@edistar.com)
Responses Re: Size comparison between a Composite type and an  (Denis Gasparin <denis@edistar.com>)
List pgsql-general
denis@edistar.com writes:

> I need to store very large integers (more of 30 digits).

Er,

What's wrong with the NUMERIC type?  That can go up to hundreds of
digits.

-Doug

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Roman Neuhauser
Date:
Subject: Re: majordomo unmaintained, postmaster emails ignored?
Next
From: "Nikolay Samokhvalov"
Date:
Subject: Re: Sequences/defaults and pg_dump