Re: Sun-Oracle lovefest: PostGreNeverMind - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Sun-Oracle lovefest: PostGreNeverMind |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20060111181048.GQ3902@pervasive.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Sun-Oracle lovefest: PostGreNeverMind ("Lance Obermeyer" <LObermey@pervasive.com>) |
Responses |
UNSUBSCRIBE
|
List | pgsql-advocacy |
I don't know if it's still the case, but a few years ago an IBM hardware salesman I knew made many deals to get people running Oracle off of Sun hardware and onto an RS/6000. It was a very easy sell, because (at least for Oracle workloads) an equivalent RS/6000 machine would have half the CPUs of the Sparc machine. When you factored in the amount of money saved in Oracle licensing, the new IBM hardware paid for itself in 12 months. On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:09:02AM -0600, Lance Obermeyer wrote: > The free Oracle deal is limited to their high end Sparc servers, which (according to the article) are losing market share. It is not offered for their Opteron servers, which seem to be gaining share due to superior design. I think theseare mostly different markets. Oracle on the proprietary architecture servers, PostgreSQL on the commodity architectureservers. Seems a reasonable strategy to me. > > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Joshua D. Drake > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 10:00 AM > To: Ned Lilly > Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Sun-Oracle lovefest: PostGreNeverMind > > > Ned Lilly wrote: > > > http://news.com.com/2100-1012-6025568.html > > > > "The bigger the machine, the cooler this gets," Sun CEO Scott McNealy > > said at a Sun-Oracle employee town hall meeting at Oracle headquarters > > where the deal was announced. "We're going to effectively give you the > > Oracle database for free with a year of support with our new pricing > > model." > > > I don't read it as PostGreNeverMind. I read it as Oracle has more > mindshare, marketshare and more money then PostgreSQL so it makes darn > good business > sense to have a partnership with Oracle as well. > > Sun is going to go where the money is. There is not a ton of money in > PostgreSQL or MySQL (although a heck of a lot more in MySQL). > > Joshua D. Drake > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend > > > > -- > The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support > Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting > Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/ > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
pgsql-advocacy by date: