BUG #2129: dblink problem - Mailing list pgsql-bugs
From | Akio Iwaasa |
---|---|
Subject | BUG #2129: dblink problem |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20051226133452.26999F0AC8@svr2.postgresql.org Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: BUG #2129: dblink problem
|
List | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2129 Logged by: Akio Iwaasa Email address: iwaasa@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp PostgreSQL version: 7.4.10 Operating system: Redhat EL ES 3.0 Description: dblink problem Details: I'm very sorry for my poor English. "postgres" process terminated with "signal 11" because of my wrong SQL statement using "dblink". --- SQL statement(Select statement a function) --- select into RET * from dblink(''select C1,C2,C3 from TABLE01 where ... '') <<<<< 3 column as LINK_TABLE01(LC1 varchar(5),LC2 varchar(5), LC3 varchar(5),LC4 varchar(5)) ; <<<<< 4 column --------------------------------------------------- Backtrace is below. --- (gdb) core /usr/local/pgsql74a/data/base/10218530/core.20823 Core was generated by `postgres: postgres nwops [local] CO'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. : (gdb) bt #0 0x00575ffb in strlen () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #1 0x081f222a in varcharin (fcinfo=0xbfffbf70) at varchar.c:368 #2 0x0821b86e in FunctionCall3 (flinfo=0x89f5b60, arg1=29795, arg2=0, arg3=64) at fmgr.c:1016 #3 0x08120647 in BuildTupleFromCStrings (attinmeta= 0x89f5b00, values=0x8a2e2f0) at execTuples.c:730 #4 0x00b5173d in dblink_record (fcinfo=0xbfffc160) at dblink.c:699 #5 0x0811c8c8 in ExecMakeTableFunctionResult (funcexpr=0x89f5058, econtext=0x89f4c70, expectedDesc=0x89f4e08, returnDesc=0xbfffc244) at execQual.c:1057 #6 0x0812882c in FunctionNext (node=0x89f4be8) at nodeFunctionscan.c:78 #7 0x0811fba6 in ExecScan (node=0x89f4be8, accessMtd=0x81287dc <FunctionNext>) at execScan.c:98 #8 0x08128906 in ExecFunctionScan (node=0x89f4be8) at nodeFunctionscan.c:128 #9 0x0811aa0c in ExecProcNode (node=0x89f4be8) at execProcnode.c:322 #10 0x081190b8 in ExecutePlan (estate=0x89f4ad8, planstate=0x89f4be8, operation=CMD_SELECT, numberTuples=1, direction=ForwardScanDirection, dest=0x82b4734) at execMain.c:1103 #11 0x081182f5 in ExecutorRun (queryDesc=0x89e66b0, direction=ForwardScanDirection, count=1) at execMain.c:249 #12 0x0812fb65 in _SPI_pquery (queryDesc=0x89e66b0, runit=1 '\001', useCurrentSnapshot=0 '\0', tcount=1) at spi.c:1254 #13 0x0812fa5c in _SPI_execute_plan (plan=0x8a1b728, ValuNulls=0x8a19398 " 1111112", useCurrentSnapshot=0 '\0', tcount=1) at spi.c:1201 #14 0x0812da75 in SPI_execp (plan=0x8a1b728, Values= 0x8a193e0, Nulls=0x8a19398 " 1111112", tcount=1) at spi.c:241 #15 0x00ed97a3 in exec_run_select (estate=0xbfffc620, expr=0x89e9170, maxtuples=1, portalP=0x0) at pl_exec.c:3223 #16 0x00ed6abe in exec_stmt_select (estate=0xbfffc620, stmt=0x89e9250) at pl_exec.c:1519 #17 0x00ed5eb6 in exec_stmt (estate=0xbfffc620, stmt=0x89e9250) at pl_exec.c:967 #18 0x00ed5d3e in exec_stmts (estate=0xbfffc620, stmts=0x89e8ed0) at pl_exec.c:903 #19 0x00ed5c28 in exec_stmt_block (estate=0xbfffc620, block=0x89ebfd8) at pl_exec.c:859 #20 0x00ed56f0 in plpgsql_exec_trigger (func=0x89e86a8, trigdata=0xbfffc830) at pl_exec.c:645 #21 0x00ed149f in plpgsql_call_handler (fcinfo=0xbfffc700) at pl_handler.c:121 #22 0x0810442b in ExecCallTriggerFunc (trigdata=0xbfffc830, finfo=0x89e26d8, per_tuple_context=0x89e0500) at trigger.c:1150 #23 0x0810562c in DeferredTriggerExecute (event=0x89eeb10, itemno=0, rel=0xb5549300, trigdesc=0x89e2370, finfo=0x89e26c0, per_tuple_context=0x89e0500) at trigger.c:1867 #24 0x0810589a in deferredTriggerInvokeEvents ( immediate_only=1 '\001') at trigger.c:2008 #25 0x08105a38 in DeferredTriggerEndQuery () at trigger.c:2143 #26 0x0819d61a in finish_xact_command () at postgres.c:1757 #27 0x0819c427 in exec_simple_query (query_string=0x89dcfb8 "COPY user_info_tbl FROM STDIN ;") at postgres.c:946 #28 0x0819eb0e in PostgresMain (argc=4, argv=0x8990430, username=0x89903a0 "postgres") at postgres.c:2918 #29 0x081728b8 in BackendFork (port=0x899cd70) at postmaster.c:2564 #30 0x08171fe2 in BackendStartup (port=0x899cd70) at postmaster.c:2207 #31 0x08170661 in ServerLoop () at postmaster.c:1119 #32 0x08170100 in PostmasterMain (argc=1, argv=0x898f538) at postmaster.c:897 #33 0x08137ccb in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfffd9e4) at main.c:214 (gdb) up #1 0x081f222a in varcharin (fcinfo=0xbfffbf70) at varchar.c:368 (gdb) p s $10 = 0x7463 <Address 0x7463 out of bounds> (gdb) up #2 0x0821b86e in FunctionCall3 (flinfo=0x89f5b60, arg1=29795, arg2=0, arg3=64) at fmgr.c:1016 (gdb) up #3 0x08120647 in BuildTupleFromCStrings (attinmeta= 0x89f5b00, values=0x8a2e2f0) at execTuples.c:730 (gdb) p i $12 = 3 (gdb) p values[0] $13 = 0x8a2066c "11111112" (gdb) p values[1] $16 = 0x8a20675 "11111112" (gdb) p values[2] $14 = 0x8a2067e "1" (gdb) p values[3] $15 = 0x7463 <Address 0x7463 out of bounds> (gdb) up #4 0x00b5173d in dblink_record (fcinfo=0xbfffc160) at dblink.c:699 (gdb) p *((PGresult *)funcctx->user_fctx) $9 = { ntups = 1, numAttributes = 3, attDescs = 0x8a205dc, tuples = 0x8a21470, tupArrSize = 128, resultStatus = PGRES_TUPLES_OK, cmdStatus = "SELECT", '\0' <repeats 33 times>, binary = 0, noticeHooks = { noticeRec = 0xac0635 <defaultNoticeReceiver>, noticeRecArg = 0x0, noticeProc = 0xac0679 <defaultNoticeProcessor>, noticeProcArg = 0x0 }, client_encoding = 1, errMsg = 0x0, errFields = 0x0, null_field = "", curBlock = 0x8a205d8, curOffset = 168, spaceLeft = 1880 } (gdb) p *(funcctx->attinmeta->tupdesc) $18 = { natts = 4, attrs = 0x89f58a0, constr = 0x0, tdhasoid = 0 '\0' } (gdb) --- Of course this trouble occurred because of my mistake, but I think that it is better if "dblink" returns an error for a wrong SQL statement. If "numAttributes"*1 was smaller than "natts"*2 before "dblink_record" calls "BuildTupleFromCStrings", dblink can not return error ? *1 funcctx->user_fctx->numAttributes *2 funcctx->attinmeta->tupdesc->natts
pgsql-bugs by date: