On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:04:50AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's not that easy --- in the MVCC world there simply isn't a unique
> count that is the right answer for every observer. But the idea of
> packaging a count(*) mechanism as an index type seems like it might be
> a good one. I don't think the planner objection need be taken too
> seriously: we already have a good big wart in there for recognizing
> MIN/MAX indexability, and this sort of transformation would fit pretty
> naturally with what's already done in planagg.c.
AFAICS two big problems with using an index type:
1. The index isn't told when the tuple is deleted.
2. The server expects to be able to lookup an index.
Other than that...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
