Re: horology regression test failure - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Martin Pitt
Subject Re: horology regression test failure
Date
Msg-id 20051220202309.GU5684@piware.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: horology regression test failure  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: horology regression test failure
Re: horology regression test failure
List pgsql-bugs
Hi Tom!

Tom Lane [2005-12-20 12:49 -0500]:
> Martin Pitt <martin@piware.de> writes:
> > So it seems that the test suite uses the timezone files from the
> > installed system instead of the files in the temporary installation in
> > the regression test directory.
>=20
> It's not supposed to, and AFAICT it works fine for me (not only on my
> personal machines, but also on Red Hat's build machines).  Perhaps
> you've done something to break the package-relocation logic?  All those
> files should be sought via paths relative to the postmaster executable.

Maybe I did something wrong with the configure options. That bug is
reproducible with the pristine upstream 8.1.1 tarball and doing:

./configure --prefix=3D/usr  --mandir=3D"\${prefix}/share/man"  \
  --sysconfdir=3D/etc  --libdir=3D"\${prefix}/lib/postgresql/8.1/lib" \
  --libexecdir=3D"\${prefix}/lib/postgresql-8.1/lib" \
  --mandir=3D\${prefix}/share/postgresql/8.1/man \
  --with-docdir=3D\${prefix}/share/doc/postgresql-doc-8.1 \
  --datadir=3D\${prefix}/share/postgresql/8.1 \
  --bindir=3D\${prefix}/lib/postgresql/8.1/bin \
  --includedir=3D\${prefix}/include/postgresql/8.1
make
make check

However, it does *not* happen when I do not specify any configure
options at all. I'll try to narrow down the problematic change
further, but can you already see what the problem is here?

Thanks,

Martin

--=20
Martin Pitt        http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer   http://www.debian.org

In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: horology regression test failure
Next
From: Martin Pitt
Date:
Subject: Re: horology regression test failure