Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >The distinction is that RPMs and pginstaller are port-specific, binary
> >distributions.
> >
> >
> So they can't be considered official port releases for the PGDG? They
> are not "forks".
> Or, are you saying that the only official PGDG release is the source?
Yes, I think the only official PGDG stuff is source. The binaries are
done by port-specific teams. PGDG doesn't deal with MSI installer
issues, or RPM issues, only the port-specific teams do. I know I don't
read any RPM emails and any MSI issues are dealt with by the Win32
people.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
