Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date
Msg-id 200512021839.jB2Id0G29878@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > The basic problem is that with two deterministic flags the default
> > values for those flags are unclear.
>
> That's a really good point ... the only explainable default would be
> that both are --without, which is a crummy default.
>
> I think the way that Bruce's patch works is fine, only the name of the
> switch needs tweaking ;-)

Already renamed and patch posted:

  --with-bonjour          build with Bonjour support
  --with-openssl          build with OpenSSL support
  --with-libedit-preferred  prefer libedit over readline
  --without-readline      do not use Readline

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype