On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 02:21:33PM -0500, Eric E wrote:
> >maybe you can solve it adding a new col and allow both to contain null
> >values.
> >
> >if these are not mutually exclusive you can avoid a check if they are
> >check that if one has a non-null value other has null...
>
>
> I did think about that, but I disliked the idea of two fields of nulls for
> every one full field.... maybe it's not as bad a way of doing it as I
> thought.
What's wrong with multiple NULL fields? It's probably the cleanest,
fastest way to do this...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
