Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Creager
Subject Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1
Date
Msg-id 20051108140935.0000615b@C118181.stortek.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:09:58 -0600
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:46:27PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > For all the talk about "couldn't it be part of regression", I haven't seen 
> > anyone submit a patch that would test for it ... since I believe both you 
> > and Tom have both stated that "for things like race conditions, I don't 
> > know that you can create reproducable cases", can you submit a patch for 
> > how you propose this should be added to the regression tests?
> 
> I have an idea, but it might be better if Robert could produce a test
> case since it would cover both a context storm issue as well as this
> race condition.
> 

Actually, I have a test case.  I just sent it out to Tom a couple of hours ago. 
The quick and dirty is that it shows the problem after running for about 20
minutes on my Xenon system with 8.1.0...  I cannot get it to fail on my AMD
system with a much higher load...

I can send it to others who are interested.  The e-mail with dump, module and
script is just over 1Mb.

Cheers,
Rob


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paesold
Date:
Subject: Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems
Next
From: Michael Paesold
Date:
Subject: Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems