Hi Jim,
Thank you for your help. We are going to increase the max_fxm_pages
according to the test I have been running through out the week.
If we increase the max_fsm_pages, do we need to bump up the shared_buffers
and the size of the shared memory segment of the Linux kernel(shmmax)?
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 2:38 PM
To: Carlos Oliva
Cc: 'Tom Lane'; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Setting max_fsm_pages
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 08:05:29PM -0500, Carlos Oliva wrote:
> Thank you for your response Tom.
>
> Should I set the max_fsm_pages to the "total pages needed" obtained from a
> full vacuum or from a analize vacuum? When I run a vacuum analyze
(vacuumdb
> -z -v), I get a smaller number of pages needed than when I run a full
vacuum
> with analyze (vacuumdb -f -z -v)
There shouldn't be any difference because of analyze. But remember that
as the tables change in size (as well as in the number of dead tuples),
total pages needed can change. For example, if you run a vacuum
immediately after a vacuum full on a system with no other activity,
you'll get:
INFO: free space map: 0 relations, 0 pages stored; 0 total pages needed
That's because there's no dead space to be reclaimed.
Your best bet is to do a vacuum verbose (vacuumdb -v) after the database
has been running for a while using whatever vacuuming scheme you're
going to use (such as pg_autovacuum). That will give you a pretty good
estimate of how many pages you really need. Even that's not 100%
reliable though, so you still need to include extra space as a safety
margin.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
