Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > So instead of changing the names of the CommandDest enum, I'm hiding it
> > from external view.
>
> I thought renaming them was a better idea, actually. A whole separate
> include file to have one forward typedef seems pretty silly. Nor am I
> convinced that you won't break some people's code by removing the rest
> of dest.h from spi.h. Finally, for anyone who *does* need to include
> dest.h, this doesn't address the underlying problem of risk of conflict
> of names.
Does the change make building PL/PHP easier?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
