Kevin,
> When it gets downt to the detail, it may make sense to combine
> or split some of these. For example, runtime_options should
> probably not have a column for each currently known option,
> but a child table which maps to all non-default option values.
I'm a little cautious about storing only non-defaults; the defaults have
changed from version to version, after all. If we did that, we'd need to
have a "defaults" table in the db as a reference list.
Also, we'll need to store runtime options both on the "machine" level and
on the "query" level, in order to allow testing of changing an enable_* or
other query cost option at runtime. Not sure how to capture this,
though.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
